Skip to main content

Decoding Article 35-A


Article 35-A has become the focal point of many debates in the recent few weeks, laying emphasis on the special status of Jammu and Kashmir. While Article 35-A still remains unchallenged, A Supreme Court bench is working its way very hard to examine the constitutional validity of this Article.

What is Article 35-A?

Article 35-A is a provision that was incorporated in the constitution giving the J&K legislature a carte blanche to decide who all are to be regarded as the permanent members of the state and to confer them with some special rights and privileges.

How did it come about?

In the mid-twentieth century, the representatives to the Constituent Assembly of J&K requested that only those provisions of the Indian Constitution that corresponded to the original Instrument of Accession should be applied to the State. Accordingly, the Article 370 was incorporated into the Indian Constitution, which stipulated that the other Articles of the Constitution that gave powers to the Central Government would be applied to Jammu and Kashmir only with the concurrence of the State's constituent assembly. This was a "temporary provision" in that its applicability was intended to last till the formulation and adoption of the State's constitution. However, the State's constituent assembly dissolved itself on 25 January 1957 without recommending either abrogation or amendment of the Article 370. Thus the Article has become a permanent feature of the Indian constitution, as confirmed by various rulings of the Supreme Court of India and the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir, the latest of which was in October 2015. Under the 1952 Delhi agreement between Abdullah and Nehru, several provisions of the constitution were incorporated in J&K via presidential orders in 1954. Article 35-A was then inserted.

The current discussion

The following Article started making headlines after a couple of petitions went down knocking the doors of the Supreme Court. One of them was an NGO “we the citizens”, who challenged the Article by contending that the due procedure was not followed to bring the constitutional amendment as laid down under Article 368 and that Article 35-A was never presented in front of the parliament. The parliamentary route of forming law was bypassed when the President inserted Article 35A into the Constitution. Article 368 (i) of the Constitution empowers only Parliament to amend the Constitution. The NGO also contended that the following Article is against the spirit of unity in India as it restricts people from other states to get employment or buy property in Jammu and Kashmir thus violating Articles 14, 19 and 21.  Another petition was filed by a native of Jammu and Kashmir, challenging Article 35A for protecting certain provisions of the Jammu and Kashmir Constitution, which restrict the basic right to property if a native woman marries a man not holding a permanent resident certificate. “Her children are denied a permanent resident certificate, thereby considering them illegitimate.”

Along with the legal dimension associated with Article 35-A, there are various political perspectives associated with it too. Some parties are opposed to Article 35-A as they perceive it as an infringement or obstacle for people from other states to purchase property or look for employment in the state; and some are in favour of Article 35-A.

What could the consequences be?

In this legal battle having multidimensional perspectives associated with such a complicated issue, the consequences resulting out of Article 35-A being repealed could be drastic. The first threat emanating from such a step is the violence that could rise in the state by the separatist. Separatist leaders have already started urging people for mass agitation if the Supreme Court repeals Article 35-A. Also, the extension of the fundamental rights and other provisions to J&K through presidential orders will cease to apply; only Article 1 and 370 would then apply to the state of J&K if Article 35-A  is repealed.

Solving the issue of Article 35-A could prove itself to be a mammoth task which if not handled cautiously could create turmoil in the valley, one thing that must be adhered to is a discussion. There is a need to have a constructive debate on Article 35-A among the political parties, intelligence agencies and the civil society at large.

Written By:
Nishant Sharma
I Year

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in the article are those of the author and do not reflect the views and opinions of the Blog.




Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

INTRA INSTITUTE DEBATE CHAMPIONSHIP - 2018

The ability to formulate your thoughts is something that everybody possess. However, it is the ability to put across your thoughts in such a manner that they appeal to those listening, is the gift of oration. Everybody is a speaker, but not everybody is an orator.  The annual edition of the Intra-Institute Debate Competition was organized on the 15 th of February, 2018. The debate was organized in two rounds with the first eliminations round being organized on the 13 th February, open to the whole student body. The eliminations saw strong participation on the topic ‘Is Space Exploration Ethical’. On the basis of the performance at the elimination rounds, 8 teams were chosen to participate in the final round organized on the 15 th in the Multi-purpose Hall (MPH). These 8 teams were: Afreen & Nritika (II Year) Fury (IV Year) & Kainat (II Year) Sankalp & Arundhati (III Year) Trisha & Anshul (II Year) Vatsala & Tavish (V Year) Prateek ...
Post a Comment
Read more

INTRA INSTITUTE MOOT COURT COMPETITION 2018

For students of law, mooting is perhaps the most important skill one must hone. To facilitate the students in getting optimum mooting experience, the Army Institute of Law holds the Intra-Institute Moot Court Competition annually.  The final round of the Intra-Institute Moot Court Competition 2018 was held on the 12th of April 2018. The competition was conducted over 2 preliminary rounds held on 10th and 11th of April 2018 and semi-final and final round held on the 12th. The competition saw 16 teams fighting out the Proposition prepared by Mr. Anil Malhotra, senior advocate. The preliminary and semi-final rounds were presided by faculty members of the institute. Gracing the bench for the final round were Justice Dipak Sibal, Judge, Punjab & Haryana High Court, Prof. Dr. Rattan Singh, Director Panjab University and Mr. Anil Malhotra, Senior Advocate, Punjab & Haryana High Court. Reaching the finals were Team 1 comprising Shweta Nair and Akanksha ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi: Man of the Millennium

M.K GANDHI: MAN OF THE MILLENNIUM “The bald, lanky, shirtless, bespectacled man from India, Father of the Nation, Gandhi was the pivot behind India's struggle for freedom against British rule.” Few people who have walked this planet have made an impact as huge as Mahatma Gandhi. The bald, lanky, shirtless, bespectacled man from India, Father of the Nation, Gandhi was the pivot behind India’s struggle for freedom against British rule. While the first revolt against the British rule was in 1857, it was nothing as massive as that led by Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi. He led an army of millions all bound by two principles, truth and non-violence. Gandhi started a number of relentless movements to reach the final goal that was freedom and the same was achieved for India on August 15, 1947. It was only fitting that the title of ‘Mahatma’ was conferred upon this great Indian leader. Mahatma Gandhi studied law in United Kingdom and went ahead to South Africa to practice as a lawye...
Post a Comment
Read more