Skip to main content

3D PRINTING

WHAT IS 3D PRINTING?

First started in 1987, 3-D Printing is also known as Additive Manufacturing in which layers after layers of material are created to create an object. This method helps in making precise and complex products with less wastage than traditional manufacturing. Many low cost and high performing 3D printers are available in the market which makes it very convenient to produce things. This makes it very easy to manufacture whatever anyone wants, opening a gateway to Black Market of such products. A variety of things ranging from fabrics to ceramic can be printed using this technology.

WHAT IS REQUIRED TO PRINT A 3D OBJECT?

To make a product using 3D printing only two things are required which is: an electronic prototype of the wanted product and a 3D printer. Electronic prototype can be obtained by two means; the first being obtaining or buying the electronic blueprint online and second being writing the programme by self.

LEGAL ASPECT

While looking from a legal aspect there are two things that need to be protected as Intellectual Property: the CAD (Computer Aided Device) file, and the product itself.

COPYRIGHT LAW

The CAD file, which instruct a computer to print an object, can be protected under the Copy Right Act, 1957 under section 14 subsection (b) and (c) which says that definition of a Copyright includes any two dimensional depiction of a three dimensional work and vice versa when it is written originally by a user. The CAD files are a relevant piece of evidence when it comes to stopping someone from infringing the copyright.

However the CAD file which is developed after scanning an object in which case the CAD file will be an exact replica of the object. This becomes a problem when the consumers are given the freedom to produce articles of need at home.

DESIGNS LAW

Although the word CAD had design in it, it does not fall in the definition of Design of the Designs Act, 2000 as a single consumer who produces goods for himself won’t fall in the category of “industrial process’’. For example, jewellery as such is not patented but the design of jewellery by Tanishq Jewellers is, a consumer printing such jewellery will be infringing the Design.  Therefore if the good is printed/produced for personal use there is no infringement, however when the good is printed for the purpose of selling, it becomes an infringement.


PATENT LAW

If the product in dispute is a Patent protected product, then a 3D printed replica of the same can be stopped from being distributed in a market. However if it is not Patented then there is in no law that protects the product from being illegally reproduced.

WILL IT MAKE COUNTERFEITING OF GOODS EASIER MANIFOLD?

The problem with 3D printing is that if a product which is copyright/ trade mark/ design protected is copied and printed through a 3D printer by a consumer for personal use there will no infringement of any of the copyright/ trade mark/ design. However if the same is done with the intention of selling the product or use it commercially, there will be an infringement.
This makes it very difficult to determine the right of the person holding a license of such product which is copyright/ trade mark/ design protected is violated or not since he will face damages and lose market even if consumer of his product(s) start producing his goods for personal use.

SOLUTION

1.      We need laws governing sale of 3D Printer to households, since it will disrupt the economy by making products available at low costs

2.      The words ‘private use’ and ‘non-commercial personal use’ need to be replaced as they produce a grey area for reproduction of products and CAD files and will affect the revenue of the license-holders.

3.      The term “industrial process” in the Designs Act needs to be removed or replaced or it will lead to opening up gateways to Black Market of 3D printed replicas.

CONCLUSION

3D printing as of date does not pose any threat to the economy, but however in the near future when this technique of production will get more efficient and cost effective it will be a potential threat to the economy because it will result in:

1.      Mass unemployment, since it will be more precise is production,

2.      Easy/availability of products since the products will be printable at home;

3.      Huge rate of infringement of products, trademarks and designs as there is no law protecting the same.

Written By
Shubhangi Gaur
IV Year

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in the article are those of the author and do not reflect the views and opinions of the Blog.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Guest Lecture: Socio-Religious Reforms through Judicial Intervention

On 3rd January, 2020 our esteemed guest Prof. (Dr.) Virender Kumar, Former Director of Judicial Academy Chandigarh, delivered a lecture on the topic 'Socio-Religious Reforms through Judicial Intervention: A Critique of Sabrimala Judgement' . He discussed the Sabrimala Judgement with the students and acquainted them with different possible interpretations of Article 25. Overall it was an informative and enlightening lecture for all.

National Seminar 2019

Army Institute of Law organised its annual national seminar on 12th October, 2019. The theme for this years seminar was "Dynamics of Gender Equations in the 21st Century: Socio-Legal perspectives." The Chief Guest for the seminar was Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajeev Bhalla, Former Judge, Punjab and Haryana High Court, and the Keynote Speaker was Advocate Palika Monga Deputy Advocate General, Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh. Several delegates presented their research papers and valuable insights on distinct areas of Gender Equations throughout the course of the event, in the various technical sessions. Behind the curtains were Mrs. Amrita rathi - the faculty coordinator, Mr. Omvir and Mr. Yuvraj - the student coordinators, faculty members, students volunteers and the management and technical staff who put in tireless efforts for pulling off a successful seminar.

Novices Moot Court Competition

Novices Moot Court Competition is an annual event of the Army Institute of Law, Mohali, in which students who join the course of B.A.L.L.B. are introduced to the activity of mooting. Moot is the mock activity on how the legal proceedings take place in the courts. Novices is a beginners's guide for the First year's students to make them learn formal legal writing and drafting, to develop good and effective oratory skills and to work as a team in coordination with each other. This year the Competition was held from 19th to 22nd August, 2019. The rounds were nail biting as rigorous questioning was done by the judges. With the end of the final round, the following came out to be the winners - Category Teams Cash Prizes Winners TC 12 - Khushi Singh (1901) & V Prisha (1914) Rs. 2800 Runners-up TC 19 – Rajat Sharma (1965) & Akash A M (1944) Rs. 2200 Best Student