Skip to main content

3D PRINTING

WHAT IS 3D PRINTING?

First started in 1987, 3-D Printing is also known as Additive Manufacturing in which layers after layers of material are created to create an object. This method helps in making precise and complex products with less wastage than traditional manufacturing. Many low cost and high performing 3D printers are available in the market which makes it very convenient to produce things. This makes it very easy to manufacture whatever anyone wants, opening a gateway to Black Market of such products. A variety of things ranging from fabrics to ceramic can be printed using this technology.

WHAT IS REQUIRED TO PRINT A 3D OBJECT?

To make a product using 3D printing only two things are required which is: an electronic prototype of the wanted product and a 3D printer. Electronic prototype can be obtained by two means; the first being obtaining or buying the electronic blueprint online and second being writing the programme by self.

LEGAL ASPECT

While looking from a legal aspect there are two things that need to be protected as Intellectual Property: the CAD (Computer Aided Device) file, and the product itself.

COPYRIGHT LAW

The CAD file, which instruct a computer to print an object, can be protected under the Copy Right Act, 1957 under section 14 subsection (b) and (c) which says that definition of a Copyright includes any two dimensional depiction of a three dimensional work and vice versa when it is written originally by a user. The CAD files are a relevant piece of evidence when it comes to stopping someone from infringing the copyright.

However the CAD file which is developed after scanning an object in which case the CAD file will be an exact replica of the object. This becomes a problem when the consumers are given the freedom to produce articles of need at home.

DESIGNS LAW

Although the word CAD had design in it, it does not fall in the definition of Design of the Designs Act, 2000 as a single consumer who produces goods for himself won’t fall in the category of “industrial process’’. For example, jewellery as such is not patented but the design of jewellery by Tanishq Jewellers is, a consumer printing such jewellery will be infringing the Design.  Therefore if the good is printed/produced for personal use there is no infringement, however when the good is printed for the purpose of selling, it becomes an infringement.


PATENT LAW

If the product in dispute is a Patent protected product, then a 3D printed replica of the same can be stopped from being distributed in a market. However if it is not Patented then there is in no law that protects the product from being illegally reproduced.

WILL IT MAKE COUNTERFEITING OF GOODS EASIER MANIFOLD?

The problem with 3D printing is that if a product which is copyright/ trade mark/ design protected is copied and printed through a 3D printer by a consumer for personal use there will no infringement of any of the copyright/ trade mark/ design. However if the same is done with the intention of selling the product or use it commercially, there will be an infringement.
This makes it very difficult to determine the right of the person holding a license of such product which is copyright/ trade mark/ design protected is violated or not since he will face damages and lose market even if consumer of his product(s) start producing his goods for personal use.

SOLUTION

1.      We need laws governing sale of 3D Printer to households, since it will disrupt the economy by making products available at low costs

2.      The words ‘private use’ and ‘non-commercial personal use’ need to be replaced as they produce a grey area for reproduction of products and CAD files and will affect the revenue of the license-holders.

3.      The term “industrial process” in the Designs Act needs to be removed or replaced or it will lead to opening up gateways to Black Market of 3D printed replicas.

CONCLUSION

3D printing as of date does not pose any threat to the economy, but however in the near future when this technique of production will get more efficient and cost effective it will be a potential threat to the economy because it will result in:

1.      Mass unemployment, since it will be more precise is production,

2.      Easy/availability of products since the products will be printable at home;

3.      Huge rate of infringement of products, trademarks and designs as there is no law protecting the same.

Written By
Shubhangi Gaur
IV Year

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in the article are those of the author and do not reflect the views and opinions of the Blog.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

INTRA INSTITUTE DEBATE CHAMPIONSHIP - 2018

The ability to formulate your thoughts is something that everybody possess. However, it is the ability to put across your thoughts in such a manner that they appeal to those listening, is the gift of oration. Everybody is a speaker, but not everybody is an orator.  The annual edition of the Intra-Institute Debate Competition was organized on the 15 th of February, 2018. The debate was organized in two rounds with the first eliminations round being organized on the 13 th February, open to the whole student body. The eliminations saw strong participation on the topic ‘Is Space Exploration Ethical’. On the basis of the performance at the elimination rounds, 8 teams were chosen to participate in the final round organized on the 15 th in the Multi-purpose Hall (MPH). These 8 teams were: Afreen & Nritika (II Year) Fury (IV Year) & Kainat (II Year) Sankalp & Arundhati (III Year) Trisha & Anshul (II Year) Vatsala & Tavish (V Year) Prateek ...
Post a Comment
Read more

INTRA INSTITUTE MOOT COURT COMPETITION 2018

For students of law, mooting is perhaps the most important skill one must hone. To facilitate the students in getting optimum mooting experience, the Army Institute of Law holds the Intra-Institute Moot Court Competition annually.  The final round of the Intra-Institute Moot Court Competition 2018 was held on the 12th of April 2018. The competition was conducted over 2 preliminary rounds held on 10th and 11th of April 2018 and semi-final and final round held on the 12th. The competition saw 16 teams fighting out the Proposition prepared by Mr. Anil Malhotra, senior advocate. The preliminary and semi-final rounds were presided by faculty members of the institute. Gracing the bench for the final round were Justice Dipak Sibal, Judge, Punjab & Haryana High Court, Prof. Dr. Rattan Singh, Director Panjab University and Mr. Anil Malhotra, Senior Advocate, Punjab & Haryana High Court. Reaching the finals were Team 1 comprising Shweta Nair and Akanksha ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi: Man of the Millennium

M.K GANDHI: MAN OF THE MILLENNIUM “The bald, lanky, shirtless, bespectacled man from India, Father of the Nation, Gandhi was the pivot behind India's struggle for freedom against British rule.” Few people who have walked this planet have made an impact as huge as Mahatma Gandhi. The bald, lanky, shirtless, bespectacled man from India, Father of the Nation, Gandhi was the pivot behind India’s struggle for freedom against British rule. While the first revolt against the British rule was in 1857, it was nothing as massive as that led by Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi. He led an army of millions all bound by two principles, truth and non-violence. Gandhi started a number of relentless movements to reach the final goal that was freedom and the same was achieved for India on August 15, 1947. It was only fitting that the title of ‘Mahatma’ was conferred upon this great Indian leader. Mahatma Gandhi studied law in United Kingdom and went ahead to South Africa to practice as a lawye...
Post a Comment
Read more