Skip to main content

SUPREME COURT ALLOWS PASSIVE EUTHANASIA, SETS GUIDELINES


In a noteworthy choice, the Supreme Court on 09th March 2018 proclaimed passive euthanasia and the right of people, including the terminally ill, to give mandates to reject therapeutic treatment as permissible.

A Constitution Bench, driven by the Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra, in three concurring assessments, maintained that the basic right to life and nobility incorporates the right to decline treatment and die with pride.

The basic appropriate to a "significant presence" includes a man's decision to pass on without anguish, it held. Chief Justice Misra discussed the societal weight and dread of criminal risk by relatives and medical specialists which often furthered the undignified passing of the patient.
The court said the time had come to get rid of such collective enduring and feeling of blame and to face the truth. Medical professional attending to the critically ill were feeling the pressure of releasing the patient, securing criminal obligation and dread of being drawn into a "vortex" of a conceivable family battle for legacy.

Chief Justice Misra, in a combined judgment along with Justice A.M. Khanwilkar, declared that the time had come to "alleviate the agony of an individual" and stand by their right to pass with dignity. A meaningful existence should be followed by dignified death, the five-judge Bench agreed unanimously.

Justice A.K. Sikri, in his separate opinion, said though religion, morality, philosophy, law and society shared equally strong and conflicting opinions about whether right to life included right to death, they all agreed that a person should die with dignity. Hence, the court, Justice Sikri said, was in favour of a person’s right to die with dignity.

Justice Sikri said a living will or an advance directive from a patient to stop medical treatment at a time, "particularly when he is brain dead or clinically dead or not revivable", supressed the possibility of future regret for relatives and any criminal action against medical practitioners.

The Chief Justice's judgment has set for guidelines which are specific for testing the validity of a particular living will, who must certify it, when and how it would come into effect, etc. The guidelines also provide for a situation where a living will may not exist and how one may plea passive euthanasia under such circumastances.

Separately, Justice Chandrachud also observed that medical science in its modern form should be aimed at balancing the quest for prolong life with and the need for patients to lead a quality life. He said, that the two had to coexist, it was meaningless to have one without the other. Matters related to death and when a person may die are perhaps beyond the boundaries of law, however, the court believed that it was possible for it to intervene since these matters are also concerned with a person’s autonomy and liberty

"Free will includes the right of a person to refuse medical treatment," said Justice Chandrachud.

But, at the same time, the judge held that what is unlawful, is active euthanasia.

"To deprive a person dignity at the end of life is to deprive him of a meaningful existence," Justice Chandrachud read from his opinion which he shared with Justice Ashok Bhushan.



Picture Credits: Tribune India.

--

Written By: 
Harshita Chaarag
IV Year
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in the article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of the Blog.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

EXTEMPORE COMPETITION 2018 – THURSDAY ACTIVITY

On a wonderful Thursday Afternoon, when the sun was shining bright, Army Institute of Law organised an Extempore Competition as part of the Thursday Activity. 15 enthusiastic students, took part in this joyous competition.
Emcee Aaryan RK (Second Year) hosted the competition and the students by way of chit system, chose their topics for the Extempore. The students were allotted topics from various burning issues. Be it GST, Demonetisation, Triple Talaq or Internet Censorship etc., participants elocuted their views in a very articulate manner, whilst grappling the attention of the audience members. It indeed was a delight to hear such wonderful points/views, put forth by the participants.
More often than not, we come across such topics and discussions in our day to day life, but in this Thursday Activity, participants enlightened the audience while dealing with the intricacies associated with the topics assigned to them. Of-course, anecdotes, quotations, added humour to the entire compe…

DRIVE AGAINST DRUG ABUSE

DRUG ABUSE PREVENTION OATH
Drug addiction is a problem that is increasing in our society. Today there is an ever increasing tendency amongst the youth for trying something new or doing something that their friends are doing. This often takes them to the path which leads them either on the doorstep of depression or to serious health problems.
Drug addiction can terribly hinder and restraint us from accomplishing our goals and dreams in life. People sometimes feel that they are too bright, too powerful, and too formidable to control to become addictive. Addiction can trap anyone. It can cause harm to one's body and also lead to problems in the family. Delinquent behaviour in the society is also another consequence. The sooner people seek help for drug addiction problems, the more chances they have of gaining control of their lives. However, abstinence is the safest way to live a longer and healthier life.
As part of the Anti-Drug Drive, an initiative of the Hon’ble Capt. Amarinder Sing…

THURSDAY DIARIES: INTRA INSTITUTE DANCE COMPETITION 2018

Dance to express, not to impress”
This Thursday Activity witnessed the cheerful Intra Institute Dance Competition which saw fervent participation of the fluid and balletic dancers of the AIL. The MP hall was as usual full of an energetic crowd but the real attraction were the excited participants from various batches who came forward to show their extraordinary dance skills. They danced on mellifluous songs with sprightly energy. The competition began with solo performance, followed by the duet category.
The Solo category was won by Sonu Parmer from 1st Year. She with her supple and graceful moves made the crowd cheer.
In the Duet category the First prize was won by Ruhul Amin and Dilisha Nair from 1st Year and the Second prize was won by Shivani Anand and Simran Walia from 3rd & 4th year respectively. Both the teams with their rhythmic and rock-steady moves left everyone spellbound. This enthusiasm and energy has always been part of the institution and this vigour always prevails…